Capital of Nasty Electronic Magazine Volume VII, Issue 8, AD MMII Tuesday, April 23, 2002 ISSN 1482-0471 ------------------------------------------- "If you are wearing a seat belt, your chances of being killed or seriously injured in a traffic crash are at least 50 percent better than if you are not wearing one. In addition, we all share the financial burden of deaths and injuries due to traffic crashes." -- "NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES - DRIVER'S MANUAL", page 66 ------------------------------------------- Only presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial "we." ------------------------------------------- 1. Editorial 2. You're a FUNNY GUY Now Shut the Fuck Up Part 3 3. Kid's Corner 4. George W. Bush's "Evil Empire" 5. Coffee Tip ------------------------------------------- This week's Golden Testicle award: http://www.misanthropic-bitch.com/hot_pregnant_teens_here.html Teen Mothers: poster children for forced euthanasia ------------------------------------------- 1. Editorial The Measure of a Man (Or, Clamp my Nipples) By Leandro Asnaghi-Nicastro My grandmother's 38 years old gas stove decided to break the other day. It turns out that if you have a stove that's more than 20 years old, you can't find any spare parts for it. So you're stuck with a semi-functional stove just because a small bracket the size of a credit card that holds a piece together somewhere inside is no longer made. My grandmother decided therefore to go and buy herself a new gas stove. I overheard this whole conversation in the back of my brain but took no notice, mostly figuring that a gas stove could not possibly interfere with my life in any way possible. The first sign that this assumption was terribly wrong was when I arrived at her house and found the new stove just sitting there, and I saw that evil gleam in my family's eyes. I realized right there and then that I was the new Gas Stove Installer. This seems to be one of the faith induced cruces I enjoy, thanks to the random cosmic chance of my birth that assigned me to this family. I have never installed a stove before. I don't know half of the things that are involved in doing such a thing or if there are any special rules, other than making sure the gas main is closed while you work. This is where I think school should come in handy. Instead of teaching you algebraic formulae that you forget four minutes after the end of high school, there should be a course that gives you practical teachings in life that you will actually use. An example of this would be teaching young students how to change a flat tire. How to change fuses. The proper handling of a baby with a full diaper. How to operate a washing machine, with the understanding of hot, cold wash, the difference between whites and colours, and how to fold clothes once done. And, in my case, if your grandmother buys a stove and makes you the install man, how to do so with the least amount of swearing, broken fingers and spilled blood. It's no surprise that no amount of Math, English, Biochemistry or History, or tuition paid helped me out here. Physics was the exception, which made me realize that gravity works at all times, when the huge pliers fell right on my toe. Logic dictated, however, that this could not be a difficult task. Pull out the old stove, close the gas valve, undo the flexible cable that hooks up the old stove to the gas main, move old stove, insert new stove and repeat in reverse the steps involved. If I can build a computer with random scattered parts, a stove should be a primordial piece of technology in comparison. So I pulled up my sleeves and with a sigh of surrender I began. About two hours later, I discovered that pipes, when they've been well tightened together for over 38 years, form some sort of bond that prevents them from ever coming apart. It doesn't matter that you just may have the right tools for the job or have plenty of strength to open an endless supply of marmelade jars. They're stuck together no matter how many helpful suggestions your family -- all hovering around you -- can possibly come up with. On the bright side, parts that were not meant to come off, did, allowing me to take the flexible tube, the regulator and two feet of pipe with me to the hardware store. At the hardware store, after explaining my tale to the clerks, we tried to remove all the extra pieces of piping that were attached to the flexible tube. We failed miserably, despite the tools and a workshop. The pieces proved to be as stubborn as one of those old Italian men that sits all day long in a barber shop. So I opted for the only option left: buy everything new. The clerk also explained that I needed some sort of compound in some parts of the bolts but not in others, albeit I am still at a loss as to why. This turned out to be the first of many trips to the hardware store. When I got home I discovered that the beauty of standards is that there are many of them to pick from. Whoever makes stoves seems to pick the one that wasn't used for the previous one. My only task at this point was to figure out which standard the new stove and the gas main followed and get the appropriate pieces. Back at the hardware store I explained how the new flexible pipe had female connectors at both ends and both the stove and the main were female connectors. I was asked if I had any nipples at home ("Yes sir, I do, but I fail to understand what that has to do with a stove..."), but I suppose the look on my face explained both my ignorance and confusion. The clerk quickly explained what a nipple is. For all you pervs out there, it is some sort of piece that has both ends as male connectors, allowing it to be a bridge between two female connectors. Or something. I forget now. When I went back home I discovered I had the right pieces, but of the wrong size. To add insult to injury, all the measurements for these pipes, connectors and related were in inches, which I still fail to understand. All the measuring tapes I found in the house are metric. And to me a quarter inch to a three-eighths of an inch look exactly the same. It's like when I drive in the States and I fill up the car in gallons. Am I being ripped off or is the price good? I have no idea, meanwhile my car took a ridiculously low amount of gallons but the tank appears to be full. So I drove back to the hardware store and we tried to figure out what size I needed. I got different parts, and headed back to my grandmother's. The pieces this time were too small. Out of desperation, and since this was already taking three hours longer than the one I had planned, I drove home, grabbed my Polaroid camera, drove back to my grandmother's, snapped photos of the main with the pieces I had next to it as a comparison, snapped a few of the stove's connector and then drove back to the hardware store. At this point they seemed to have an idea of what pieces were involved. They muttered incomprehsible jargon that involved inches, nipples, males and females, making rude gestures with fingers. Confused, I quickly traded the old pieces I had bought before for the new pieces, ran back and lo, they fit. In less than five minutes I had the main fixed, secured with the new connectors and the flexible pipe, connected the stove, opened the valve and watched as the methane blue flames lit up without any problems. People that had climbed Mount Everest and came back to tell the tale with their feeling of achievement are nothing in comparison. When I returned home, I found my mother measuring the height of the fridge to that of the cabinets on top of it, less than a centimetre above it. She bought a new fridge. It's significantly taller than the one we currently have. ------------------------------------------- 2. You're a FUNNY GUY Now Shut the Fuck Up Part 3 FUNNY GUYS and their FUNNY VOICES By Jason MacIsaac Having worked in a restaurant once, I'm of the opinion that nobody should be allowed to get service in one until they completed a three part course on manners, patience, and how to calculate 15 percent. Anyone who's worked in a restaurant will agree. FUNNY GUYS love to go into restaurants, because no rational person is actually willing to listen to them, but at a restaurant, the staff has little choice. If you missed my previous installments, you'll need a definition of a FUNNY GUY. A FUNNY GUY is a person who works very hard at being funny, thinks he is extremely funny, and isn't, causing great pain in misery to those subjected to their humour. It's a little like getting surgery from the guy who swears he knows the heart is up in the chest somewhere. Servers are taught to be polite to everyone, even FUNNY GUYS. Few things are more humiliating than standing in a dopey uniform (dopey, but with a higher IQ than most customers), waiting for some FUNNY GUY to cough a twenty dollar bill and hope he actually leaves you more change. If Ghandi and Mother Theresa had ever worked in a restaurant, believe me, they'd be chain smokers with a history of random violence against people who ask for a third glass of water. Turn this other cheek, buddy. Take the other day, when I was in a local Mexicali restaurant. At a table nearby was a FUNNY GUY, laughing at his own jokes. FUNNY GUYS are always laughing at their own jokes, loud enough so that the rats out in the alley behind the restaurant are thinking "Who's this asshole?" The FUNNY GUY in question was impressing himself with his ability to imitate famous characters. Some FUNNY GUYS have the ability to make their voices slightly lower or higher. And they use this one FUNNY voice when they want to impersonate a Frenchman, a stereotypical homosexual, Donald Duck, Carl Sagan, whatever. I feel it is my sacred duty to humiliate FUNNY GUYS with FUNNY VOICES. It's easy, just guess out loud what the voice was supposed to be. "Very FUNNY, guy. Adolph Hitler, right?" "No," says the FUNNY GUY, slightly non-plussed. "Marilyn Monroe." "Oh." But actually, I have to give this FUNNY GUY at my local Mexicali restaurant credit. He did an excellent Arnold Schwarzenegger. I mean that honestly, without the usual bitter sarcasm. He sounded exactly like Arnold. Bang on. The only problem was that he was using his Arnold voice to say things like "Luke, I am your father. Come to the Dark Side..." And then he laughed. Loud. Fortunately, I have a guaranteed cure for this behavior. Read the next line, and I guarantee you'll never laugh at your own jokes again. Bob Saget laughs at his own jokes. And he's the only one who laughs at them at all. Get the message? There are a certain people who you want to get served first in a restaurant. FUNNY GUYS are one of them. While they're eating, they can't make "jokes." I bought this guy five plates of nachos to shut him up. His Yoda sounded like Michael Jackson. When he announced that he was going to do Michael Jackson, and sounded like Bill Clinton, I interrupted him and then told him that his voice wasn't high enough for Michael Jackson. I asked if perhaps castration with blunt garden shears would help. "I was just trying to be friendly," he muttered, hurt. Not as hurt though, as if I'd actually castrated him. The best FUNNY GUYS with FUNNY VOICES are the ones who impersonate actors impersonating other people. Particularly if they're eight- year old Saturday Night Live bits. Oh please, can we hear you doing Dana Carvey doing George Bush saying "Not gonna do it! Not gonna gloat?" How about Hans and Franz promising to "pump you up"? You know that Saturday Night Live always milk a gag at least five years after it stops being funny, but WHEN YOU DO IT, SUDDENLY IT BECOMES FUCKING HILARIOUS ALL OVER AGAIN. GOSH MR. FUNNY GUY, WHAT'S YOUR SECRET? Can you do Mr. T? How about ET? Or wait, Richard Nixon? How about anyone that hasn't been dead for 20 years? The voices are really one of the most pathetic tricks in the FG's limited repertoire. At least when he's in the elevator eyeing a case of beer someone is bringing up to their apartment, he has a chance to stumble on something legitimately funny. Or at least raise a grin on your face when you discover that someone else has the courage to tell a FUNNY GUY that it is unlikely, though not impossible that a six pack will fit up his rectum. But when he insists on bringing in the voices, he's just going over material that has already been gone over a million times before. The FUNNY GUY'S need to shove an aspect of his personality down everyone's throat is ever more apparent. I will say no more on FUNNY GUYS and their FUNNY VOICES. Nothing I can say here can compare to the immortal words of Rowan Atkinson as Lord Black Adder: "Oh, well, we are proud of our comic serving-wench voice, aren't we? Just because we can say 'zur' instead of `sur.' Essential at all social gatherings, the tedious little turd who keeps putting on amusing voices. What else have you got in your outstandingly inventive repertoire, I wonder? Ah, a brilliant drunk Glaswegian, no doubt. An hilarious black man: `See you, Jimmy,' 'Where am dat warty-melon.' Fabulous! I can't wait to see your side-splitting poof and your funny little croaky one who isn't anyone in particular, but is such a scream. And most of all, I like the one you do all the time, the fat-headed German chamberpot standing in front of me." Incidentally, I do a wicked impersonation of Black Adder, but because I ain't a FUNNY GUY, I'll spare you. --- Jason MacIsaac presses 4 on the keyboard to select a water arrow. ------------------------------------------- 3. Kid's Corner: Bringing complicated issues down to a level even you can understand Dear Kid's Corner, We were reading the constitution in school and when we got to the part where it says "No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed" the teacher didn't know what a bill of attainder was. None of the other teachers could figure it out. We even asked the principal and he didn't know either. Could you tell us what that means? Katie, Grade 5 Assboink, Idaho Well Katie, a bill of attainder is basically a law that says takes away someone's rights without giving them a trial. For example, a law that says, "John Smith is a bad person and all his property now belongs to the state" would be a bill of attainder because it takes away his property without going through the courts. The reason bills of attainder are prohibited has something to do with a concept your teacher has probably mentioned a few times: the separation of powers. That means that there has to be a balance between the people who make the laws (the legislature) and the people who decide if laws have been broken (the courts). If the legislature were allowed to pass a bill of attainder that balance would be gone because the courts wouldn't get a chance to stop them from abusing their power. What the legislature can do is make a law that says, "Being John Smith is a crime punishable by having one's property confiscated". That is not a bill of attainder because John's property can't be confiscated until a court finds him guilty of this "crime". Of course, if such a silly law were passed the court would probably decide that the law is unconstitutional and refuse to carry out the sentence. In this way the authors of the constitution ensured the courts could stop the legislature from abusing their power. You probably think that the constitutional is pretty clear when it comes to bills of attainder and that's all there is to it, but it's not that simple. The constitution was written a long time ago, and while most people think it's full of good ideas, it's not really followed too closely. After all, just because someone writes down some rules doesn't mean everyone else has to follow them. Right, Katie? One example of when people had to ignore the constitution is the internment of Japanese-Americans during the Second World War. At the time, Japan was America's enemy and people were worried about spies and traitors. President Roosevelt issued what's called an executive order - that's like a special law - to arrest and hold Japanese- Americans in internment camps. Since people were effectively locked up without a trial, President Roosevelt's order was a bill of attainder. Just imagine the hassle if they had to give trials to over 100 000 people! More recently a law was passed that prohibits crazy people and convicted felons from buying guns. In theory, since being crazy is not a crime, this law is a bill of attainder because it takes away someone's constitutional right to bear arms without giving them a trial. The interesting thing is that's it's also an ex post facto law (a law that punishes someone for something they did before the law was passed). If someone went to jail for a crime before this law was passed then they still can't buy a gun, even though that wasn't part of the original punishment the court ordered for them. It's like they got punished and then later the law changed and they got another punishment on top of it. Isn't the world a crazy place? In one law both parts of the "No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed" clause are broken! It just goes to show you can't always follow the rules, but I guess every kid in the world already knows that. --- Konrad the Bold believes is teaching children to rationalize dishonesty and hypocrisy. He must be stopped. Email: konradthebold at hotpop.com. ------------------------------------------- 4. George W. Bush's "Evil Empire" or Get your Assault Rifle Out of my Ass By Reverend Martinez As a devout and impartial Canadian, I (along with many others I'm sure) have some bones to pick with the unfolding of events in recent months. What remained for a long time semi-political thoughts about the war on terrorism kept to myself and only revealed to friends at parties where my inebriation muddled the message somewhat, have abruptly become up-front personal views that I would not hesitate to discuss at any moment. The turning point from grassroots rambler to grassroots politico came one day at the office as I read the daily news from www.pulse24.com.. I need my news live and late breaking. One (or two - like it matters) US laser-guided bombs found their way to a squad of Canadian troops in Afghanistan killing 4 and injuring several during a training exercise. Now, I won't even begin to go into how stupid I think the whole military exercise in Afghanistan is. Okay I will. Now, you've probably heard this time and time again, but it remains a fact that the war on 'terrorism' is flawed in at least two respects: one, in that 'terrorism' does not occupy a set geographical land mass with which to be readily bombable (the Onion has a great article on this http://www.theonion.com/onion3734/us_vows_to_defeat_whoever.html) thus disabling the US from doing just about anything to it except to acknowledge that it will be around for a long long time, and two; in that the war is being waged on a very loose interpretation of 'terrorism'. I point the learned readership to a talk by Noam Chomsky on the whole topic (http://www.zmag.org/GlobalWatch/chomskymit.htm) because he will be better able to give a background on that than I ever will. There is arguably a third flaw - that war is stupid - but I am willing to discount this since, although stupid, war and violence as a whole is regrettably effective. Not to cherrypick, but it seems that the United States has more proverbial fingers in more proverbial pies than it knows what to do with. The whole issue of them funding the same group of Afghani fighters fighting against Russia at the time that turned around and blew up in their face is just one of many blunders their foreign policy has committed. This coupled with the fact they didn't provide evidence of Bin Laden's direct involvement before condemning him and, vicariously, the poverty-stricken nation he occupied at the time, and also oppose such apparently normal and common-sensical things like the Ottawa Convention on the Prohibition of Landmines as well as the International Criminal Court (Michael Byers, Globe and Mail, April 18th, 2002, p.A13 - web version of article can be found at http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/GIS.Servlets.HTMLTemplate?tf=tga m/search/tgam/SearchFullStory.html&cf=tgam/search/tgam/SearchFullSto ry.cfg&configFileLoc=tgam/config&encoded_keywords=northern+command&o ption=&start_row=7¤t_row=7&start_row_offset1=&num_rows=1&searc h_results_start=1) doesn't exactly give them much credibility in the eyes of the world when they leap forth and proclaim they fight for freedom and won't take no crap from nobody. I, for one, never really elected the United States to be my defender. In fact in the face of terrorism, all their military might is really good for is not to protect against attack, but rather to exact blind, vengeful acts on a populace which doesn't deserve anymore than what they've already been through. The same Globe article mentioned above talks about a proposed 'Northern Command' that would put our nonexistent forces under the command of General Yankee Tankenheimer. I really hope this doesn't come into effect, at least not without some serious conditions and/or exceptions, as there are far too many differences in our countries' respective foreign affairs and domestic public attitudes for one to literally be 'burdened' with the other: if the States want to shoot up the world, I wouldn't want Canada to have to tag along like an unwilling younger sibling. Likewise, I wouldn't want to be accused of hindering a superpower in its pursuit of 'Enduring Freedom'. Although I have been labelled thick-skinned, I don't think I'd be able to withstand sniper fire from unidentified gunmen sent to shut me up. All I have left to say on the topic is that the US is getting too involved in everything and pissing too many people off. How long can Canada withstand being its top trade partner and not start to draw attention to itself? --- The reverend lives an impoverished life in London, England and is currently looking for a cave to protect his white ass from doomsday. Hell - it's working for al-Qaeda. ------------------------------------------- 5. Coffee Dive By REVSCRJ One of the perks of working in a coffee shop is that often you get to work with really beautiful women and develop friendships without the innate suspicion that all you are trying to do is fuck them. It's a good thing, that. I never really go on the make (tangentially: whenever I do something really horrendous happens), so its really annoying to me when a woman blows me off simply because she is used to guys having ulterior motives at all times, and assume that I am the same. I mean, I understand the necessity of the defence mechanism, as most men are simply fists and penises with legs to move them around, but not ALL of them. Just because you are pretty doesn't mean I want to make love to you, because that is what it is to me: making love, solidifying the bonds of connection between two people, communicating in movement and sensation, the language of adoration and union. So it's great to be able to work with women who wouldn't normally give me the time of day, unscrutinised. I have made good friendships like this. The other perk is, of course, all the free caffeine you can drink... mmmm.... So anyway, I'm working with this beautiful Sicilian woman, Andrea, when in walks this ogre of a man carrying a huge club/walking stick. He is shabbily dressed and sports a huge red beard. He comes up to the register where I am waiting to serve. Andrea has her back to the ordering area as she is grinding a bulk coffee order that has just been called in. "Hey Hey, what can I get for ya?" He still hasn't made eye-contact with me and is shifting back and forth stretching a little to look over the espresso machine with rather trollish obviousness at Andrea's ass. "Hey, did you - uhm -- want something?" He wrenches his fixed gaze over at me as if having to dislodge vertebrae to do so and says with this booze abuser gravel in his voice: "NOT FROM YOU, I want her to help me." I look over at Andrea who shoots me this I'll-help-him-if-you-want- but-he-scares-me look on her face. I turn back to the guy and say: "Look man, she's busy. I'm here. If you want something I'll get it, if not then please leave." He makes some guttural noise, ignores me, and trys to get Andrea's attention. "Allright man, get out." Now he looks at me. "WHAT? ARE YOU TRYING TO KICK ME OUT OF HERE?" This guy stands a full foot above me, and shifts to that puffed chest intimidation posture. I'm not impressed, I mean, I figure that he is just fronting. "Yeah, I'm asking you to leave, man." He starts in to a string of profanity that is barely cohesive and gets red in the face like I'd just stolen his last meal or slept with his wife -- I mean really, he goes aggro: veins all popping, fat face shaking, body tense and pitched forward. Okay, he's serious I see, but I try to stay calm and focused. "Look man, I don't want to have to call the cops but I will if you don't go right now! JUST GET OUT!" He lifts up his club like a batter and pulls it back to swing, yells: "YOU WANNA FIGHT ME YOU LITTLE PUNK? HUH? YOU WANNA FIGHT ME?" "NO, I DON'T want to FUCKING fight you, I WANT you to GET THE FUCK OUT RIGHT NOW!" I stand there unflinching, just waiting for him to swing. Andrea is already on her way to call the cops and there is this eternity (real time: 3 seconds) in which time is still. He drops the club to his side and yells: "I'LL BE WAITING FOR YOU MOTHERFUCKER, I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU!" He wasn't waiting for me later, primarily because the police came by later to drive me by and ID him -- apparently he had also been threatening some folks on a park bench. The owner of the coffee shop did show me where he kept an axe, "Should anything like that happen again." An 'axe' -- Jesus! Andrea was impressed with how I had handled the situation, but I didn't use it for leverage to try and sleep with her, thus, we are friends to this day. --- REVSCRJ is a writer/musician living in Monterey, California. Constantly on the verge of homelessness, he hopes that you enjoy his work or else his life has been in vain. Contact REVSCRJ at revscrj@cloudfactory.org to lodge complaints, notify of lawsuits, or receive spiritual advice. ------------------------------------------- CoN would not be possible without the great help of Scriba Org. CoN: Hands up. Who finds transvestite and transsexual porn arousing? What? No one on the entire fucking planet? So you can stop posting them now fuckface. Capital of Nasty Electronic Magazine "media you can abuse" In memory of Father Ross "Padre" Legere Published every second Monday (or when we get around it) Disclaimer: unintentionally offensive Comments, queries and submissions are welcome http://www.capnasty.org ISSN 1482-0471 A bi-weekly electronic journal. Subscriptions available at no cost electronically. Available on Usenet newsgroups alt.zines and alt.ezines. This mailing is sent exclusively to those poor souls who chose to subscribe to the Capital of Nasty mailing list. Spread the word! If you have friends who would like to receive CoN, ask them to send email to join@capnasty.org. If you'd like to unsubscribe because such email aggravates your transvestite or transsexual porn intolerance, simply send an empty message to leave@capnasty.org. Brought to you by C.C.C.P. (Collective Communist Computing Proletariat) Leandro Asnaghi-Nicastro Colin Barrett ZimID 708EC8D1 1994/09/14 EC B0 97 59 1D FE 7C 32 7E 04 2C 66 47 41 FB 7D