====================================================================== The Atlanta Declaration: Every man, woman, and responsible child has a natural, fundamental, and inalienable human, individual, civil, and Constitutional right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- handgun, shotgun, rifle, machinegun, \anything\ -- any time, anywhere, without asking anyone's permission. ====================================================================== L. NEIL SMITH'S \LEVER ACTION\ LETTER NUMBER 02b == THE SAME BOAT AMENDMENT == As a gun owner, for over 20 years I've spent time almost every day dealing with political threats to individual, human, Civil, and Constitutional rights which were supposed to be guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. I'm sick of the legislative terrorism that makes it necessary and of parting with a thick slice of my standard of living for the privilege. Either the Constitution has teeth or it's an empty exercise. If it's the supreme law of the land as advertised, where are the penalties, fines, and prison sentences for those who enact bills that violate it? At least they should be subject to as much harassment as their average constituent. If they had to throw their money down the same rat-hole we do, if their fortunes rose and fell with ours, if they were forced to scrape by day by day like the rest of us, they might find something better to do with their free time than threaten our fundamental rights. They might even get some feedback, missing heretofore, concerning the wisdom of the measures they adopt. Engaged as they are in a never-ending struggle against the Bill of Rights, your legislature and congress won't do this job on themselves, but the late Howard Jarvis showed us the way by leading a popular revolt against property taxes in California. Could it be done again? And what should be done? It should be something that lets us play by our own rules, on our own field, and with our own bat and ball, since politicians are too adroit on their own territory at the kind of chicanery which has cost us all so much. It might be nice to save taxpayers some money and provide other benefits, such as bailing out the troubled savings and loan industry. The idea? Allow me to introduce the "Same Boat Amendment": 1. No elected or appointed official at any governmental level may receive more in salary, benefits, and expenses during his term of office \or for ten years\ afterward than his average productive sector constituent; employees of companies deriving more than 10% of their income from government are excluded for purposes of calculating the average. 2. Officials subject to the Same Boat Amendment \will\ participate in the Social Security system; other income (business, inheritance, investment, spouse's wealth, speaking fees) will be placed in randomly selected S&Ls until the specified period ends. 3. Officials subject to the Same Boat Amendment will file detailed weekly income and expenditure statements for scrutiny by the IRS, the media, and the public; telephone "hotlines" and "whistle-blower" rewards will be provided; a suspected official's salary and benefits will be suspended pending results of any investigation. 4. All violations of the Same Boat Amendment will result in immediate removal from office, loss of salary, benefits, expenses, \along with all deposited monies\, and no fewer than 25 years in a federal maximum-security prison; introducing, sponsoring, or voting for legislation intended to evade the Same Boat Amendment or falsify the statistical base on which calculations are made will be treated as violations. Now about here, someone's bound to object that there are good legislators out there across the land and that the Same Boat Amendment constitutes a form of indiscriminate group punishment. Why not? Haven't innocent gun owners been group-punished for decades for the actions of criminals and assassins? Sure it's indiscriminate. After the way George Bush caved in on the semi-auto issue, who deserves special consideration? Anyway, I'm not sure what a "good" legislator is. Imaginary differences between the two major parties aside, voting seems to have degenerated lately into a choice between the dregs that settle to the bottom of the barrel and the scum that floats to the top. In the productive sector, if you had an employee who showed you the same loyalty most legislators do for their oath of office, you'd fire him. If you had a car that worked as well in this respect as Congress, you'd drive it straight into the crusher yourself. It's especially important that "good" legislators (if indeed such mythical beasts exist) be placed in the Same Boat with all the rest. Maybe they'll stop singing the virtues of compromise (a mistake the other side \never\ makes) and get in there and fight for us. Those who value the right to own and carry weapons need to broaden the front we fight on, too -- our base of political support -- and even non-shooters will love the Same Boat Amendment. Genuine liberals (as opposed to the limousine type who vote for gun control, then hire machinegun-toting bodyguards) will like it because it's egalitarian. Conservatives will like it because it makes fiscal sense. Libertarians will like it because politicians will be forced, as a matter of sheer survival, to reconsider economic theories (from Adam Smith to F.A. von Hayek) which make sense and abandon theories (from Karl Marx to John Maynard Keynes) which don't. So how do we get started? Xerox this and mail it to your "favorite" congressperson, legislator, or city councilman. Make sure that he, she, or it understands (and you do, too) that just because certain aspects of the idea are funny (I think they are, anyway), that doesn't mean it isn't serious. Explain carefully that it'll be hard mustering enough support for the Same Boat Amendment if gun owners are too busy shooting at tin cans, iron silhouettes, and paper targets to circulate petitions. On the other hand, if their guns have to be hidden away, they'll all have lots and lots of free time. \For politics.\ *** LEGISLATORS TAKE NOTE: this issue -- and the Same Boat Amendment itself -- is dedicated to your colleagues Howard Berman, Cardiss Collins, John Conyers, Edward Feighan, Edward Kennedy, Howard Metzenbaum, Abner Mikva, Pete Stark, Sidney Yates, the semi-late Mario Biaggi, the ever-peculiar Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and others of their ilk who made it necessary. ====================================================================== L. NEIL SMITH'S \LEVER ACTION\ LETTER NUMBER 02b 111 EAST DRAKE ROAD SUITE 7032 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO U.S.A. 80525 L. Neil Smith is the award-winning author of 16 novels including \Henry Martyn, The Crystal Empire, BrightSuit MacBear, Taflak Lysandra, The Probability Broach,\ and the forthcoming FORGE OF THE ELDERS trilogy, beginning with CONTACT AND COMMUNE. Your contributions to this effort, while extremely welcome, are not tax-deductible. ====================================================================== X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X Another file downloaded from: The NIRVANAnet(tm) Seven & the Temple of the Screaming Electron Taipan Enigma 510/935-5845 Burn This Flag Zardoz 408/363-9766 realitycheck Poindexter Fortran 510/527-1662 Lies Unlimited Mick Freen 801/278-2699 The New Dork Sublime Biffnix 415/864-DORK The Shrine Rif Raf 206/794-6674 Planet Mirth Simon Jester 510/786-6560 "Raw Data for Raw Nerves" X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X