Prophe-Zine, Issue # 24 Aug 15, 1996 Raymond Gano..........Welcome to Issue # 24 Patti Lalonde ....Building The Third Temple Thomas D. Ice ....Why the Doctrine of the Pretribulational Rapture Did Not Begin with Margaret Macdonald Prophe-Zine News Bites ....Assorted News sources and faithful readers Jack Van Impe...THE COMING WORLD GOVERNMENT Wayne Merritt ...Like it or Not, Cash is Becoming Obsolete....... Justin Pet Microchips in CA Tod Strandberg...Nearing Midnight Update Grant Jeffrey's Latest Bestseller - The Signature of God US Rep Henry Hyde ...GOALS 2000 AND OBE McAlvany Intelligence Advisor ...American & Global Food Crisis Statement of Faith, publication cycle notice, ect ************** Welcome to PZ # 24 Hello all, Thanks once again for DL'ing Prophe-Zine. This is an exciting issue for me. I am happy to announce that Patti Lalonde is gracing the pages of PZ once again. It has been a while since the last article. I want to thank her and her husband Paul of This Week In Bible Prophecy for allowing me to reprint "Building The Third Temple". I truly enjoy Patti's writing style and the way she presents the facts. I hope you enjoy her article as much as I did when I first received it. If you have the chance, check out their revamped www site at http://www.niagara.com/~twibp/. You can also get there from the Prophe-Zine's www links pages. MORE HOT NEW!!! I want to tell you about a GREAT new comic book series called "Archangels". Archangels is about spiritual warfare and presents a message about the trials of life and the true power of faith and prayer. Archangels is published by Eternal Studios. I found out about Archangels through my many travels on the www when I stumbled across the site. I spoke to Patrick Scott, the creator and writer for Archangels, and asked him for his latest issue. Patrick was so kind that he sent me his back issues as well to review. I want to thank him for doing that...now I am a hooked reader and I can not wait for the new issues to come. The main reason I am telling you about these comics if because Patrick and the rest of his staff have gone a long way to create a GREAT ministry with a Great message. This is a ausome means to reaching out to the youth and young people sharing about God and His Love for us. If you want to order Archangels you can call Eternal Studios and order the Archangels series. They cost $2.50 each (sold in 10 packs only). Pass them out to the youth at your church or to kids on the street. To order call 1-800-395-5599. They have cool T-shirts as well for $16.95. When you order tell them you read about it is Prophe-Zine. HOT NEWS!!!! I need help and advice from YOU the reader. I am thinking of taking PZ weekly. In doing this I will discontinue my daily news that many of you get and combine it with the weekly issue. In doing this I want to break PZ down to just 20 pages ( at 10 point ariel font printed on 8.5 x 11 page with a " boarder) I will still bring the great stories and articles, but the longer ones will be continued in the following issue. I feel that in todays world things are moving SO fast and I truly feel that time is short. We at Prophe-Zine feel that we MUST keep you and others abreast of what is going on in the world dealing with Bible Prophecy, World Events and Politics. SO what I need from you is input about this idea. Do you like it? Do you thing you will burn out? What would be better idea?...etc. Write to me at my email address...ray673@best.com. I also need to fill some positions here in helping me out put PZ together. I have 2 very good people who have told me that they are willing to step up to the challenge. I am looking for people who want to serve the Lord and have a strong commitment to the project once it is started. If you are interested you do not have to have a strong background in Bible Prophecy. I would like someone with strong editing skills and some experience in journalism. But it isnot needed. The biggest thing I am looking for is a willingness to serve an a heart that loves the Lord and also someone who has has a great love for the lost and asleep of the world. Now if this sounds like you, please drop me a note at ray673@best.com. I will respond promptly. What I want to see is your background and why you want to join the staff of PZ. If you have a resume, that is good also. Tell me about yourself. Well that is all for now. I want to say sorry for the issue being late, but like I have stated, PZ is going to be making some changes here in the future. So until we meet on this earth or in the air with our Lord... Always in His service, Ray Sr. Editor Prophe-Zine ************** Building The Third Temple by Patti Lalonde The Temple Mount, Jerusalem. It is such a tiny piece of property when considered globally. Yet it is the most sought-after and controversial piece of real estate the world has ever known. It is the most holy place of the Jewish religion. Christians claim it as significant to their own. Today, it is controlled by the Muslim faith which declares the Temple Mount the third most holy site of Islam. It is a piece of property where construction, destruction, rebuilding, and yet more destruction have been witnessed over a long history, some of it peaceful, some of it bloody. And it is a site on which the world will be witness to yet more building in the days ahead as the modern construction cranes move in for the building of the Third Temple. How do we know there will be a Third Temple reconstructed in the days ahead? Well, in Daniel 9:27 we are told that the Antichrist will sign a seven- year covenant with Israel. We are also told that in the midst of this seven year period, "the week" known as the Tribulation, the Antichrist "shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate..." Also, in II Thessalonians 2:4 we are told that the Antichrist, "who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that heis God." This act of proclaiming his own divinity is the "abomination of desolation" spoken of by the prophet Daniel, and by Jesus in Matthew 24:15. But the main point is that these events, the abomination of desolation, and sacrifice and oblation, require that the Jewish people be worshipping in a rebuilt Jewish Temple in the days ahead. Reinstituting Temple Worship The Ashes of The Red Heifer: As would be expected, therefore, if we are indeed approaching the Tribulation period, there should be a growing interest in things concerning the Third Temple and Temple worship. And this is indeed the case. In recent years there have been a fewarcheological digs taking place in the area of Qumran where the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered. The search is for the ashes of the red heifer referred to in Numbers 19 which were used in a cleansing ritual after the Jews came in contact with the dead. It is still true today that the ashes of the red heifer are required for cleansing and purifying the Jewish people for Temple worship and sacrifice. The most popular archaeological digs for the ashes of the red heifer are being independently conducted by Dr. Gary Collett, and Vendyl Jones, a former Baptist preacher who has since renounced his Christian faith. Each of these men feel that they will be the one to discover the ashes of the red heifer since Jewish tradition declares that it will be a gentile who will be responsible for their discovery. Also, apparently red heifers without blemish are being bred today that can be used in the ritual of Numbers 19. The Priesthood: The Temple, of course, also needs a priesthood to perform the Temple rituals. This is being undertaken by religious Jewish organizations preparing for the building of the Third Temple. Rabbi Nahamn Kahane of the Institute for Talmudic Commentaries and head of the Young Israel Synagogue spent many years compiling a computerized list of candidates who fulfill the requirements of a Temple priest. The Temple Institute located in the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem has been training rabbis for the priestly functions in the rebuilt Temple. And rabbinical students in Jerusalem have been training for the ancient Jewish rites of sacrifice. The Hebrew Language: Another prophetic fulfillment required for Temple worship is the revival of the Hebrew language since 1920. Zephaniah 3:9-10 says, "For then will I restore to the peoples a pure language, that they all may call on the name of the Lord, to serve Him with one accord." The Temple Treasures: Orthodox Jews in Jerusalem have also been for the past few years making vessels necessary for Temple worship. The Temple Institute is one such group and has on display many of the vessels already made. It is one of the stops we make on our tours to Israel. But the Temple Institute has not constructed all of the vessels that were in the First Temple because it is assumed that these items will be found in the near future, including the most famous of all Temple treasures, the Ark of the Covenant. The Ark and The Third Temple Perhaps the most treasured treasure of the Temple is the Ark of the Covenant. Many religious Jews today anticipate its reappearance for the Third Temple. Some religious Jews even claim to know of its secret location. But will the Ark be present for the Third Temple? After all, some conclude, it wasn't present for the Second Temple. According to Randall Price in his book In Search of Temple Treasures, "The reason the Ark could not have been returned to the Second Temple when it was constructed by Zerubabbel may be understood from a review of the historical and religious context in which this Temple existed. During the time of Zerubabbel, Judah was under the authority of Persia; under Herod it was occupied by Rome. During both periods the Temple was never free from that threat of attack. In fact, during the latter era the Roman eagle insignia had been placed above the eastern gate of the Temple and various attempts were made to set standards bearing images of the emperor in the Temple precincts. In addition, many Jewish sects felt that a non-Zadokite priesthood and the political corruption of the high priesthood had desecrated the Herodian Temple. There was even a popular opinion that the Second Temple would soon be destroyed to make room for God's final and purified Restoration Temple. Under these political conditions, no Levite who knew the secret location of the Ark would have revealed it, nor would he have considered returning the Ark to its Foundation Stone platform within the Holy ofHolies." [pg. 105] And consider that the main reason for the existence of the Tabernacle and the First Temple was simply to house the Ark, whose aim was to manifest God on earth. It seems plausible that the Ark could be present in the Third Temple, seeing as the same political conditions during the time of the Second Temple do not exist. In Search of the Lost Ark This, of course, leads us to the question, "Where was the Ark during the Second Temple period? And why was the Second Temple built, if the purpose of the Temple is to house the Ark?" In 965 B.C. King David passed on the plans for the First Temple and Temple treasures to his son Solomon. Having successfully completed the Temple Solomon installed the Ark of the Covenant, the Tabernacle and Temple vessels in 950 B.C. According to Randall Price [In Search of Temple Treasures; pg. 71], "Solomon's construction of the Temple and the Ark's placement within it marked a new beginning in the relationship between God and His people. The dedication ofthe Temple by Solomon was the high point of his spiritual career and a major transition in Israel's history. For thefirst time, the nation was at peace on every side. "Once the Ark was brought into the Temple it was to remain there and all prayer was to be directed toward it from every place on earth (I Kings 8:30, 41-43; 2 Chronicles 6:20)." But as was the usual case in the relationship between Israel and her God, Israel began to backslide. Her eventual punishment for her backslidings was the destruction of this First Temple. Price continues: "Israel's last major turn upon the hinge of the Ark comes during the great civil war that divided the kingdom between the north (Israel) and the south (Judah). King Solomon's compromise with the religions of his foreign wives started the nation on this path of spiritual defection and decline (I Kings 11:1-28). "It wasn't long before the Assyrians exiled the Israelites, leaving only the southern kingdom of Judah and the Ark. After the demise of the north, apostasy returned to Judah to inflict a greater desecration than Israel had ever known. The apex of this apostasy came with the reign of King Manasseh, who renovated the Israelite sanctuary according to a pagan design. Apparently this was done by removing all the temple vessels and replacing them with pagan idols, referred to in the biblical text as the 'abominations of the nations' (2 Kings 21:2; 2 Chronicles 33:2). The text implies that in the place of the Ark he put an image of the Canaanite fertility goddess Asherah (2 Kings 21:7; 2 Chronicles 33:7)... "Josiah [Manasseh's grandson] was a godly king who sought to make spiritual and political reforms based on the Bible. He began by renovating and purifying the Temple that Manasseh had desecrated (2 Chronicles 34:8-33). As part of this necessary reform, he ordered the Ark returned to the Temple by the faithful Levites, whose job was to transport it whenever it had to be moved (2 Chronicles 35:3). This verse records the last mention of the Ark in the Old Testament; there is nothing but silence concerning its location from this point onward." [pp. 71-73] Some just assume that these items were destroyed or loote when the Babylonians destroyed the First Temple. But in accounts of this destruction (II Kings 25:8-9 and II Chronicles 36:19) the Ark is not mentioned among the items that were looted or destroyed. According to Price, "The omission of the Ark from any list of spoils would constitute a great contradiction to biblical history. Forexample, a previous account of the Philistine capture of the Ark warranted two entire chapters (I Samuel 5-6). It seems inconsistent at best--if not impossible--that the Ark could have been captured or destroyed by the Babylonians without any mention of the fact in Scripture. "Second, it is clear from the lists of vessels taken that all of these items were later returned by the Persians (Ezra 1:7-11). They had kept an accurate inventory of these items and provided them to the Israelites in Judah for rebuilding the Temple. Such a careful accounting in the scriptural texts would certainly have mentioned the most famous object of all, the Ark." [pg. 86] So for the most part it is considered that the Ark is still out there somewhere just waiting to be revealed. Some believe that the prophet Jeremiah may have had a hand in the disappearance of the Temple treasures and the Ark of the Covenant until an appointed time. Betty Lynn writes in Pathways to Armageddon and Beyond [published by and available through This Week in Bible Prophecy], for example, "the possession of Jordan [an event prophesied for Israel that is still to be fulfilled] could play an active part in restoring temple worship in Israel! For almost twomillennia Israel has not had a proper temple, or a priesthood that could perform the rituals ordained in the law. This could soon change! "The Amos 9:11, 12 passage previously noted describes the restoration of the tabernacle. It is interesting that this same prophecy also mentions the possession of the portion of Jordan called Edom. In this prophetic reference from Amos, it sounds as if God is going to 'resurrect' David's tabernacle. How does this relate to Israel's possession of Jordan? "There is a mountain in Jordan called Nebo. The originaltabernacle, the ark of the covenant and the altar of incense may have been hidden by Jeremiah on Mount Nebo prior to the Babylonian looting of the temple. This event is described in the apocryphal book of 2 Maccabees. Although the books of the Apocrypha are not part of the Jewish or Christian canon, they do provide valuable historical information. Second Maccabees 2:1-8 tells us that the exact location of the original tabernacle, the ark of the covenant, and the altar of incense on Mount Nebo would be hidden until the "gathering of the congregation of his people." Again, God's regathering of His people in the land of Israel is the 'date stamp' for this significant reference. "If Israel possesses Jordan, it could result in the return of the lost tabernacle and temple treasures to Jerusalem after 2500 years! Would it not be just like our God to restore Israel's temple treasures using His judgment of their original oppressor, Babylon? Would it not be just like our God to restore temple worship using an act of judgment which He describes as 'vengeance for His temple' (Jeremiah 50:28; 51:11)." [pp. 182-183] There are still others who believe that some time after the death of Josiah, and before the destruction of the First Temple by the Babylonians, the Levites hid the Ark in a secret room beneath the Holy of Holies of the First Temple. And it is believed that it remained there throughout the Babylonian captivity, the time of the Second Temple, and it remains there today. Many religious Jews are sure that the Ark of the Covenant is today hidden under the Temple Mount which is, of course, controlled by the Muslims. Access Denied Two monumental events took place in Israel in 1967 and in 1981 that dashed the hopes of religious Jews who were sure the messianic age was about to be ushered in. "For religious Jews concerned with the national and spiritual redemption of Israel," writes Price, "these two tragedies are enshrined in infamy. The first was the loss of control of the Temple Mount in July of 1967, and the second was the loss of access to the underground Temple Mount Gate in July of 1981... "In 1967, the feeling of tragedy was mixed with betrayal as Defense Minister Moshe Dayan removed control of Judaism's most holy site from Rabbi Shlomo Goren and returned it to the Wakf (the Islamic authority). The Temple Mount had been captured from the Jordanian forces only a month earlier during the final days of the Six-Days War...[Dayan] announced that it had been given back to the Muslims as a gesture of peace... "In 1981, Rabbi Goren again felt betrayed by an Israeli government official. This time it was Joseph Berg, who allowed Muslim Arabs to force a conflict within Goren's secretly excavated tunnels beneath the Temple Mount. The ensuing melee resulted in the permanent closure of the dig, an excavation that Goren had proclaimed would lead to the greatest discovery of all time, the Ark of the Covenant." [pg. 159] The discovery was at Warren's Gate. In July 1981 Rabbi Meir Yehuda Getz, chief rabbi of the Western Wall was constructing a new synagogue behind the Wall that would face the Temple Mount. While the construction was going on, workers accidentally discovered Warren's Gate and an open area behind it that they believed to be from the First Temple period. Rabbis Goren and Getz put together a clandestine crew of ten men for an unofficial dig under the Temple Mount. Those involved claimed that they were may about one-and-a-half years away from reaching the surface of the Holy of Holies area and the Ark of the Covenant. But word of the clandestine operation leaked somehow and a group of Arabs entered the tunnels in a rage. In an effort to appease the Wakf the Israeli government sealed off Warren's Gate with steel and plaster, denying, according to religious Jews, access to the Ark. Gershon Salomon was one of the ten men involved with the secret dig under the Temple Mount. He is also the head of The Temple Mount Faithful which created a stone-throwing riot by the Muslims in 1990. One of the TMF's goals is to lay the cornerstone of the Third Temple which it was supposedly going to attempt to do in 1990. Gershon Salomon told This Week in Bible Prophecy in July 1993, "We know very well that the underground floors of the Second Temple are still existing today under the ground of the Temple Mount. We know that the Ark of the Covenant from the First Temple,which was hidden by the priests before the destruction of this First Temple, is still under the ground of the Temple Mount in a secret place. We know where it is. It is the same case with the Menorah, the seven candles from the wilderness which was hidden also before the destruction of the First Temple." The Great Divide There is no question that denying religious Jews access to the Temple Mount has created a great rift between them and their government. According to the American-born founder of The Temple Mount Yeshiva, Rabbi Baruch Ben-Yosef "The secular state has lost its legitimacy and its right to represent the Jewish people for denying us our natural rights to pray there, to serve God on the Temple Mount, and, of course, to rebuild the Temple... The Arabs have no rights to the Temple Mount and one day they will find themselves out with their mosques off the Temple Mount in Mecca or somewhere else." [as quoted by Adnan Husseini in an interview with Ulf Carmesund; Sept. 1991; Two Faces of the Expanding Jewish State: A Study on How Religious Motives Can Legitimate Two Jewish Groups Trying to Dominate Mount Moriah in Jerusalem; pg. 86] This great divide has grown wider with the peace process. Gershon Salomon told This Week in Bible Prophecy that religious Jews have a big problem with the government giving away land for peace. "We believe that the Land of Israel was given to us by God forever. We are not allowed to divide it, to give parts of it to other nations. This country was given to us completely, and I believe that in the close future Israel will live in the borders which God painted for them in the Bible. This is the only Land in which God painted its borders. We are not allowed to change them. Because we shall break the Word of God." And perhaps the final clincher, cementing the relationship between the national and spiritual elements of Israel came last year. Randall Price explains: "In March 1994 an unprecedented closing of the Western Wall (the only remnant of the Temple Mount accessible to Jews) followed an Arab stoning at the wall. The latter event was in response to the Hebron mosque shooting that took place on Feb. 25, 1994. This closure was the first-ever attempt by the government to restrict the religious rights of all Israelis at the Temple Mount... "After closing the wall, the government restricted the right of Jewish worshippers to carry arms. Perhaps the final blow came when the government later declared that all 'Arab-hating groups' were illegal and placed them on par with militant Islamic groups. These Jewish religious groups were branded as 'terrorists' because their objectives 'include the establishment of theocracy in the biblical Land of Israel and the violent expulsion of Arabs from that Land.' Under this definition, such groups as Kach, Kahane Chai, the Jewish Defense League, the Temple Mount Yeshiva, and the Temple Mount Faithful are now illegal terrorist organizations." [pp. 305-306] Awaiting the Messiah It is believed by some religious sects of Jewry that it will be the Messiah himself who reveals where the Ark and other Temple treasures are hidden, and that the construction of the Third Temple is paramount to the revelation of the Messiah and the Ark. Such events would obviously have a profound effect on the world. First of all, the Muslim world, which is in complete denial of the fact that the Jews have any spiritual claim to the Temple Mount, would finally be proven wrong. In fact, this is one of the reasons why the Arabs are not interested in searching for the Ark under the Temple Mount themselves. Such a discovery would prove once and for all that the Jews have a claim to the Temple Mount. Secondly, it would be seen as the time of Israel's redemption. "In a paper entitled 'Waiting in the Wings,'" writes Price, "which was distributed all over Israel, the appeal was made to give Messiah the signal to come. The article, in part read: "'We must show him we want him with all our heart. He is ready. He is just waiting for the signal from us. Moshiach is waiting in the wings. He is ready. When he comes the curtain will rise on the most magnificent stage set we could imagine--world peace and disarmament, glory and honor for the Jews, the end of strife and jealousy. We must show him through our good deeds, through our tangible anticipation, through our longing for him, that we are ready." [pp. 208-209] And it is expected it would usher in a time in which Jerusalem will be the spiritual center for all the world. "We believe," says Gershon Salomon, "at the same time that the Temple Mount must become again the seat of the Third Temple. Jerusalem must become not only a capital of Israel, but an identical capital of Israel, and at the same time, the city of God, the spiritual city for the people of Israel and then for all the nations... "This is the time, again, to build the Third Temple. Not only for us, but for all the nations, exactly as the prophet Isaiah said. My house will be a house of praying for all the nations." And indeed, this was the vision for the Temple and the Ark since Solomon built the First Temple. I Kings 8:39-43 tells us: "Then hear thou in heaven thy dwelling place, and forgive, and do, and give to every man according to his ways, whose heart thou knowest; (for thou, even thou only, knowest the hearts of all the children of men;) "That they may fear thee all the days that they live in the land which thou gavest unto our fathers. "Moreover concerning a stranger, that is not of thy people Israel, but cometh out of a far country for thy name's sake; "(For they shall hear of thy great name, and of thy stron hand, and of thy stretched out arm:) when he shall come and pray toward this house; "Hear thou in heaven thy dwelling place, and do according to all that the stranger calleth to thee for: that all people of the earth may know thy name, to fear thee, as do thy people Israel; and that they may know that this house, which I have builded, is called by thy name." Does not, however, the descriptions of the messianic age given by many religious Jews today sound instead like the prophesied new age of the Antichrist? Indeed, many descriptions of the Messiah given by Messianic Jews, such as the Lubavitchers, sounds more like the Antichrist, not the Messiah as Christians know Him. Randall Price observes: "The Lubavitcher promotion of a coming messiah who will be a strictly human, nonmiracle-working Jewish leader has opened the field for many such messianic candidates. The Lubavitchers are preparing the Jewish world to accept as messiah whoever is instrumental in bringing about the erection of the Third Temple... "Rabbi Manis Friedman, interviewed by University of Maryland professor Susan Handelman in the Hasidic journal Wellsprings, reveals the Lubavitcher opinion: "'If he goes on to build the Temple and gather all Jews back to Israel, then we will know for sure that he is the Moshiach. Moshiach comes through his accomplishments and not through his pedigree. Maimonides says that once he builds the Temple and gathers the Jews back to Israel, then we will know for sure that he is Moshiach. He doesn't have to say anything. He will accept the role, but we will give it to him. He won't take it to himself. And his coming, the moment of his coming, in the literal sense, would mean the moment when the whole world recognizes him as Moshiach...that both Jew and non-Jew recognize that he is responsible for all the wonderful improvements in the world: an end to war, an end to hunger, an end to suffering, a change in attitude.' "This new Jewish concept of the messiah, then, is that of a mortal man and a leader with sufficient charisma to captureand command the admiration of the world--if not its devotion. He will be recognized not by his lineage (as the biblical Messiah--a descendant of the Davidic dynasty), but by his acts of global significance." [pp. 209-211] This Lubavitcher Messiah will be recognized by "his accomplishments and not through his pedigree" or his lineage. Yet in the Old Testament the Jews are given various clues as how to recognize their Messiah. One of these prophetic points is that he will be from the seed of David. The New Testament, while frowning upon the study of genealogies, gives great detail about the genealogy of Jesus. Jesus did say to the Jews, "I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not" If another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive" (John 5:43) The views of the Messiah vary amongst the different Jewishsects. However, they all seem to point to the false Christ who is about to make his appearance in the world. The deception will be so great in the world at that time that the Antichrist will fit every one's expectations, for a while anyhow. The Antichrist will have something for everyone. Something for Everyone It is difficult to know exactly how some things will come into being in the future. We can ponder and speculate how things will be, but our concepts may prove to be wrong whenthe actual biblical fulfillment takes place. For example, as things are right now, it would seem impossible for there to be a Third Temple on the Temple Mount. Jews, or "Christians" for that matter, are not even allowed by the Wakf to pray while they are on the Temple Mount. But we do know from the prophetic Word that there will be a Third Temple. We just don't know exactly how the Muslims will be convinced to allow such a thing. Many today believe that the existing Dome of The Rock and the Mosque al-Aksa will have to be moved in order to accommodate the Third Temple. Gershon Salomon, for example, told This Week in Bible Prophecy, "I believe this is the will of God. It [The Dome of the Rock] must be moved. We must, you know, take it from the place. And today we have all the instruments to do it, stone by stone, very carefully, and then to put it in a package and mail it back to Mecca, the place from where it was brought. Those two buildings, the Mosque al-Aksa and The Dome of The Rock are symbols of Arab imperialistic occupation. Even if it was done before one thousand and three hundred years, it is still an imperialistic act against the will of God and the history of the most holy place of the Israeli people andother nations. It must be moved. You ask me how? I can answer very shortly. And even that answer must be long. God is together with Israel now. We must trust God. You know we trusted him in the short history of Israel, forty-five years, seven wars; a little minority against a big majority. People ask how can you do it. We did it. God did it. So as long as God is the general of the Israeli army, believe me, it will be very simple to move those two buildings. Together with God, we shall always be themajority." Yes, God is the general of the Israeli army. Unfortunately, many Jews in the days ahead will follow the wrong commander in a case of mistaken identity. And perhaps this impostor, heralding in an age of peace and tolerance and understanding will somehow convince the Jews to accept a gentile presence on the Temple Mount. We cannot know this for certain, but we do know that a description given of the Temple in Revelation 11:1-2 leaves out the outer court. "And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein. "But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months" [three-and-a-half years]. Somehow, as well, the Jews will believe that the Ark of the Covenant fits the same bill as it did during the days of Moses and King David. It was a channel for God's power and its aim was to manifest God's presence with Israel. "On earth," writes Randall Price in In Search of Temple Treasures, "the Ark was the place where God's glory was displayed as a pillar of fire by night; where Moses, Aaron, and Joshua heard God's voice; and which served as the symbol of God's power in warfare. If these divine deeds were associated with the Ark in Israel's early days, then perhaps the call to remember them in latter days when Israel once again becomes a nation may imply the Ark's reappearance at that time." [pg. 319] Interestingly, the Ark displayed God's glory through a pillar of fire at night. Perhaps this is why, in an effort to duplicate the power of the true God, the False Prophet calls fire down from the heavens. In Revelation 13:13-14 we read of the False Prophet: "And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, "And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth, by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword and did live." A Tribulation Scenario I am going to present here a possible scenario of how things may work out during the Tribulation period. Keep in mind once again that we have been given certain prophecies by God. So we know they're going to take place. Sometimes, it seems difficult to believe they will take place. But by looking at the Word of God and comparing it to current events, we begin to see patterns developing that seem to make their fulfillment more plausible. But it is only when the actual biblical fulfillment comes to fruition that we will know exactly how God saw it would work. Anyhow, we do know that the Rapture will take place. I believe it will be before the seven-year Tribulation. The time of the gentiles will have been fulfilled and God is now focusing on Israel for the final week of Daniel's prophetic seventy weeks. Probably at the beginning of this time period the Antichrist will sign a covenant with Israel and other nations, guaranteeing Israel's safety. Israel is deceived by the Antichrist and False Prophet and believes the age of her messianic redemption has arrived. A Third Temple is built, perhaps next to The Dome of The Rock and the Mosque al-Aksa. Maybe the Antichrist and False Prophet will even convince the Jews to allow a "Christian" church to be erected on the Temple Mount as well. So for a time Israel is living in peace with world and is worshipping and making sacrifices in her cherished Temple. Near the middle of the Tribulation, however, things begin to sour in this age of peace and prosperity. The Russian army from the north, along with other nations, mostly Muslim, start heading towards Israel which is now a land of "unwalled villages" (Ezekiel 38:11). It is the true God who comes to Israel's rescue and destroys this northern army. Israel recognizes her God and is now fully aware that she has been following the wrong general. The Antichrist, in his anger, goes into the Temple and in an act of self-deification, proclaims that he is God (II Thess. 2:4). This act is known as the abomination of desolation. It appears that it is at this point when the utopian kingdom created by man comes to an end and all hell breaks loose. Revelation 13:5-8 tells us: "And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. "And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. "And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds and tongues, and nations. "And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world." It could also be that at this point the mark of the beast is enforced. It wil be a sign of allegiance to the beast because God warns in Revelation 14:9-11: "And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any many worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, "The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: "And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name." The Plagues In the past God has often visited rebellious man with plagues. It was true for the Egyptians when they defied God's command to set the Israelites free. An account is given in I Samuel, chapters 4 and 5, of thi recognition by the Philistines concerning the Ark of the Covenant. In chapter 4, verses 6 to 8 we read: "And when the Philistines heard the noise of the shout,they said, What meaneth the noise of this great shout in the camp of the Hebrews? And they understood that the ark of the Lord was come into the camp. "And the Philistines were afraid, for they said, God is come into the camp. And they said, Woe unto us! for there hath not been such a thing heretofore. "Woe unto us! who shall deliver us out of the hand of these mighty gods? These are the Gods that smote the Egyptians with all the plagues in the wilderness." However, the Philistines did end up fighting Israel victoriously and captured the Ark. In chapter 5, verses 1 to 7 we read: "And the Philistines took the ark of God and brought it from Ebenezer unto Ashdod. "And when the Philistines took the ark of God, they brought it into the house of Dagon, and set it by Dagon. "And when they of Ashdod arose early on the morrow, behold, Dagon was fallen upon his face to the earth before the ark of the Lord. And they took Dagon, and set him in his place again. "And when they arose early on the morrow morning, behold, Dagon was fallen upon his face to the ground before the ark of the Lord; and the head of Dagon and both the palms of his hands were cut off upon the threshold; only the stump of Dagon was left to him. "Therefore neither the priests of Dagon, nor any that comeinto Dagon's house, tread on the threshold of Dagon in Ashdod unto this day. "But the hand of the Lord was heavy upon them of Ashdod, and he destroyed them, and smote them with emerods, even Ashdod and the coasts thereof. "And when the men of Ashdod saw that it was so, they said, The ark of the God of Israel shall not abide with us: forhis hand is sore upon us, and upon Dagon our god." The Philistines were wise enough to recognize that neither they nor their god Dagon were any match for the God of Israel. So they returned the Ark to Israel. The final generation of man will not be so wise, however. God's wrath will be manifested against those who worship the beast and take his mark through "the seven last plagues" (Revelation 15:1). Now, there are no atheists at this point. Mankind knows that it is the wrath of the God of Israel that is responsible for these plagues. But instead of bowing down to God and acknowledging its mistake, mankind blasphemes God. "And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory" (Rev. 16:9). Instead, in the ultimate manifestation of human arrogance, mankind gathers at Armageddon to destroy Israel. It is here that rebellious man meets his final destiny at "the battle of that great day of God Almighty" (verse 14). ************** Why the Doctrine of the Pretribulational Rapture Did Not Begin with Margaret Macdonald By: Thomas D. Ice Pastor, Oak Hill Bible Church, Austin, Texas From: Bibliotheca Sacra 1990 Did the key elements of the doctrine of the pretribulational rapture originate with a young Scottish girl named Margaret Macdonald, as advocated by another "Mac"--Dave MacPherson? This is the thesis put forth in a number of publications for over 15 years by MacPherson, a newsman turned rapture researcher. MacPherson's major book The Great Rapture Hoax is one in a series of revisions of his original discourse The Unbelievable Pre-Trib Origin. Dave MacPherson is convinced "that the popular Pre-Trib Rapture teaching of today was really instigated by a teenager in Scotland who lived in the early 1800's." "If Christians had known [this] all along," bemoans MacPherson concerning the historical beginnings of the pretribulational rapture, "the state of Christianity could have been vastly different today." He thinks this ignorance has been due not merely to a historical oversight, but rather to a well-orchestrated "cover-up" carefully managed by clever pretribulational leaders each step of the way. Before discussing the background of the doctrine of the pretribulational rapture, this article first discusses the background of Dave MacPherson. MacPherson's Background Dave MacPherson is dedicated to disrupting belief in the pretribulation rapture, since, according to his interpretation, it has been the cause for great disruption in his own life. "Back in 1953 1 had a jolting encounter with the Rapture," is the first sentence in one of MacPherson's books. This is a reference to his expulsion from a Christian college in California for propagating views that conflicted with the pretribulational view. He suggests that this experience was so devastating that it accounts for a setback in his Christian life. Because of his discouragement MacPherson and a friend got drunk in Mexico and passed out. MacPherson says this was a brush with death because of the many dangers that could befall someone in that condition in Mexico. Later he was involved in a wreck with a car while riding his motorcycle, and he almost lost his left arm. But these were not the beginning of his nor his family's troubles because of the pretribulational rapture. Trials and tribulations due to this doctrine seem to run in the MacPherson family. Dave's father, Norman, had planted a church in Long Beach, California and was doing quite well until a group of new people in the church caused a commotion over the timing of the rapture. Norman MacPherson was forced out of this prospering church because he had shifted from the pretribulational to the posttribulational view of the rapture. He then started another, less successful church in Long Beach. In 1983 MacPherson declared, "Fifteen years ago I knew nothing about Pre-Trib beginnings." He began his quest by writing to his father and received an answer that indicated a lack of consensus among scholars, "so I decided to do some research on my own." MacPherson's investigation gathered steam when he found a rare book in 1971 by Robert Norton, The Restoration of Apostles and Prophets; In the Catholic Apostolic Church (1861). "The important part in Norton's book," claimed MacPherson, "is a personal revelation that Margaret Macdonald had in the spring of 1830." MacPherson uses this finding to project the notion that the doctrine of the pretribulational rapture is of demonic origin through a 15-year-old Scottish lassie. John Walvoord has noted: MacPherson made these charges against pretribulationism and then afterward went to great lengths to find historic verification.... Readers will be impressed that as a newsman MacPherson builds a strong case for his position, but will be less impressed when they begin to analyze what he has actually proved. Irvingite Robert Norton included a handwritten account of Margaret Macdonald's "prophecy," which MacPherson says was the fountainhead for J. N. Darby's development of the pretribulational rapture doctrine. MacPherson does not say that Macdonald included a clear statement of the pretribulational rapture, but that she "separated the Rapture from the the Second Coming before anyone else did." According to MacPherson, Darby pilfered this two-stage teaching from Macdonald and then developed it systematically, skillfully passing it off as the fruit of his personal Bible study. Macdonald's so-called revelation that MacPherson cites to make his case revolves around two key phrases. "Margaret dramatically separated the sign of the Son of man from the coming of the Son of man," declares MacPherson, based on her phrase, "now look out for the sign of the Son of man." MacPherson argues that "she equated the sign with the Rapture--a Rapture that would occur before the revealing of Antichrist." He bases this on her statement, "I saw it was just the Lord himself descending from Heaven with a shout, just the glorified man, even Jesus." MacPherson's Errors MacPherson makes two major errors in his attempt to argue that Margaret Macdonald originated the basis for the pretribulation rapture. First, it is highly doubtful that the Macdonald "prophecy" refers to a two-stage coming of Christ, as MacPherson advocates. Therefore it would be impossible for this source to be the basis for a new idea if it did not contain those elements. MacPherson has misinterpreted Macdonald's words by equating her use of "sign" with a rapture. Rather, she is saying that only those who are spiritual will see the secret sign of the Son of Man that will precede the single, posttribulational second coming of Christ. In other words onlv those who have the light of the Holy Spirit within them will know when the Second Coming will take place because this spiritual enlightenment will enable them to have the spiritual perception to see the secret sign (not the secret rapture). These are her own words: ... all must, as Stephen was, be filled with the Holy Ghost, that they might look up, and see the brightness of the Father's glory. I saw the error to be, that men think that it will be something seen by the natural eye; but tis spiritual discernment that is needed, the eye of God in his people.... Only those who have the light of God within them will see the sign of his Appearance. No need to follow them who say, see here, or see there, for his day shall be as the lightning to those in whom the living Christ is. Tis Christ in us that will lift us up-he is the light-tis only those that are alive in him that will be caught up to meet him in the air. I saw that we must be in the Spirit, that we might see spiritual things. John was in the Spirit, when he saw a throne set in Heaven.... it is not knowledge about God that it contains, but it is in entering into God.... I felt that those who were filled with the Spirit could see spiritual things, and feel walking in the midst of them, while those who had not the Spirit could see nothing. Macdonald is clearly concerned with spiritual insight for several reasons: (1) Stephen saw into heaven; he was not raptured or taken to heaven. (2) The sign will be seen only by the spiritually enlightened. It will not be a natural or physical sign, but one perceived by "spiritual discernment." (3) She is discussing "the sign of his appearance," not His actual appearance. (4) Once a person has been so enlightened, he will not need direction from others. He will be guided directly by "the living Christ." (5) The emphasis is on seeing: "John was in the Spirit, when he saw," "those who were filled with the Spirit could see." Posttribulationist Kromminga observes that Macdonald's "prophecies made it plain that the return of the Lord depended upon the proper spiritual preparation of His Church." Anti-pretribulationist John Bray agrees that Margaret Macdonald was teaching a single coming, not a two-staged event. "The only thing new in her revelation itself seems to be that of just Spiritfilled Christians being caught up at the second coming of Christ following heavy trials and tribulation by the Antichrist," notes Bray. In other words Macdonald seems to have been teaching a posttribillational, partial rapture. Bray further explains: It seems to me that Margaret MacDonald was saying that Christians WILL face the temptation of the false Christ (antichrist) and be in "an awfully dangerous situation," and that only the Spirit IN US will enable us to be kept from being deceived; and that as the Spirit works, so"will the antichrist; but the pouring out of the Spirit will "fit us to enter into the marriage supper of the Lamb," and those filled with the Spirit would be taken while the others would be left.... Margaret MacDonald did teach a partial rapture, of course, but this did not necessarily mean that the teaching included a tribulation period FOLLOWING THAT for the other Christians.... It would not be right to takefor granted that Margaret MacDonald believed in a tribulation period following the appearing of Christ unless she had definitely said so. Rather, it would be more logical to think that her view would have been the same as prevalent among the futurists at that time, that is, tribulation then the second coming. Another point MacPherson makes to support his opinion is that "Margaret Macdonald was the first person to teach a coming of Christ that would precede the days of Antichrist." This would mean, according to MacPherson, that Macdonald had to be teaching a two-stage coming. However, it is highly questionable, as already noted, that Macdonald was referring to the rapture, as MacPherson insists. Also Macdonald was still a historicist; she believed the church was already in the tribulation and had been for hundreds of years. Therefore the Antichrist was to be soon revealed, but before the second coming. She said believers need spiritual sight so they will not be deceived. Otherwise, why would believers, including herself, need to be filled with the Spirit to escape the deception that will accompany "the fiery trial which is to try us," associated with the Antichrist's arrival? Further, she certainly includes her-self as one who needs this special ministry of the Holy Spirit, as can be seen from this passage from her "revelation." ...now shall the awful sight of a false Christ be seen on this earth, and nothing but the living Christ in us can detect this awful attempt of the enemy to deceive.... The Spirit must and will be purged out on the church, that she may be purified and filled with God.... There will be outward trial too, but 'tis principally temptation. It is brought on by the outpouring of the Spirit, and will just increase in proportion as the Spirit is poured out. The trial of the Church is from the Antichrist. It is by being filled with the Spirit that we shall be kept. I frequently said, Oh be filled with the Spirit-have the light of God in you, that you may detect satan-be full of eyes within-be clay in the hands of the pottersubmit to be filled, filled with God.... This is what we are at present made to pray much for, that speedily we may all be made ready to meet our Lord in the air-and it will be. Jesus wants his bride. His desire is toward us. Ryrie also notes a further misunderstanding of Macdonald's prophecy": She saw the church ("us") being purged by Antichrist. MacPherson reads this as meaning the church will be raptured before Antichrist, ignoring the "us" (pp. 154-55). In reality, she saw the church enduring Antichrist's persecution of the Tribulation days. Macdonald, then, was a posttribulationist. She believed the church would go through the Tribulation. This is hardly the beginnings of pretribulationism! Walvoord observes, Readers of MacPherson's Incredible Cover-Up will undoubtedly be impressed by the many long quotations, most of which are only window dressing for what he is trying to prove. When it gets down to the point of proving that either MacDonald or Irving was pretribulationist, the evidence gets very muddv. The quotations MacPherson cites do not support his conclusions. Second, in spite of MacPherson's great amount of research and writing he has yet to produce hard evidence that J. N. Darby was influenced by Macdonald's utterances, regardless of what they meant. MacPherson only assumes the connection. Throughout MacPherson's writings, he keeps presenting information about issues, developments, and beliefs from Great Britain during the early 1800s, apparently thinking that he is adding proof for his thesis that "the popular Pre-Trib Rapture teaching of today was really instigated by a teenager in Scotland who lived in the early 1800's." Much of the information is helpful and interesting, but does not prove his thesis. If his research were represented as a river, it would be a mile wide (amount of information) but only an inch deep (actual proof). Even if Darby developed the doctrine of the pretribulational rapture after Macdonald's utterance, specific proof would be needed to make a link between Macdonald and Darby. Instead MacPherson only offers speculative guesses about how Darby used his training for the law profession to manipulate Christians by hiding the supposed true origins of his teaching on the rapture. Perhaps MacPherson is using his investigative journalism training and experience to smear Darby. Scholarly Responses to MacPherson's Claims "A few Pre-Trib leaders have long asserted that scholars scoff" at his findings, declares MacPherson. "The following quotes from leading experts tell a different story!" True, many scholars have complimented MacPherson on his effort; however, most have not endorsed or agreed with MacPherson's thesis. F. F. Bruce's comments are typical: "This makes most interestingreading.... It is an illuminating book." MacPherson takes such general statements about his book as agreement with what he is saying. Most scholars, however, while saying that MacPherson's work is valuable, stop short of agreeing with his conclusion. Bruce, long associated with the Brethren movement but one who does not agree with the pretribulational rapture view, says, "Where did he [Darby] get it? The reviewer's answer would be that it was in the air in the 1820s and 1830s among eager students of unfulfilled prophecy.... direct dependence by Darby on Margaret Macdonald is unlikely." Various scholars reveal that they think, in varying degrees, that MacPherson has not proven his point. Most if not all of the following six writers whose statements are quoted do not hold to the pretribulation rapture teaching. Ernest R. Sandeen declares, This seems to be a groundless and pernicious charge. Neither Irving nor any member of the Albury group advocated any doctrine resembling the secret rapture.... Since the clear intention of this charge is to discredit the doctrine by attributing its origin to fanaticism rather than Scripture, there seems little ground for giving it any credence. Historian Timothy P. Weber's evaluation is as follows: The pretribulation rapture was a neat solution to a thorny problem and historians are still trying to determine how or where Darby got it.... A newer though still not totally convincing view contends that the doctrine initially appeared in a prophetic vision of Margaret Macdonald.... Possibly, we may have to settle for Darby's own explanation. He claimed that the doctrine virtually jumped out of the pages of Scripture once he accepted and consistently maintained the distinction between Israel and the church. American historian Richard R. Reiter says, [Robert] Cameron probably traced this important but apparently erroneous view back to S. P. Tregelles.... Recently more detailed study on this view as the origin of pretribulationism appeared in works by Dave McPherson.... Historian Ian S. Rennie ... regarded McPherson's case as interesting but not conclusive. Posttribulationist William E. Bell asserts, It seems only fair, however, in the absence of eyewitnesses to settle the argument conclusively, that the benefit of the doubt should be given to Darby, and that the charge made by Tregelles be regarded as a possibility but with insufficient support to merit its acceptance.... On the whole, however, it Seems that Darby is perhaps the most likely choicewith help from Tweedy. This conclusion is greatly strengthened by Darby's own claim to have arrived at the doctrine through his study of 2 Thessalonians 2:1-2. John Bray does not accept the MacPherson thesis either. He [Darby] rejected those practices, and he already had his new view of the Lord coming FOR THE SAINTS (as contrasted to the later coming to the earth) which he had believed since 1827.... It was the coupling of this "70th week of Daniel" prophecy and its futuristic interpretation, with the teaching of the "secret rapture," that gave to us the completed "Pre-tribulation Secret Rapture" teaching as it has now been taught for many years. [This] makes it impossible for me to believe that Darby got his Pre-Tribulation Rapture teaching from Margaret MacDonald's vision in 1830. He was already a believer in it since 1827, as he plainly said. Brethern scholar Roy A. Huebner considers MacPherson's charges as "using slander that J. N. Darby took the [truth of the] pretribulation rapture from those very opposing, demon-inspired utterances." He concludes that MacPherson did not profit by reading the utterances allegedly by Miss M. M. Instead of apprehending the plain import of her statements, as given by R. Norton, which has some affinity to the post-tribulation scheme and no real resemblance to the pretribulation rapture and dispensational truth, he has read into it what he appears so anxious to find. It seems, then, most likely that Margaret Macdonald did not teach any of the features of a pretribulation rapture doctrine as MacPherson suggests, and therefore she could not have been a source for the origin of that doctrine. The whole controversy as aroused by Dave MacPherson's claims has so little supporting evidence, despite his careful research, that one wonders how he can write his book with a straight face. Pretribulationalists should be indebted to Dave MacPherson for exposing the facts, namely, that there is no proof that MacDonald or Irving originated the pretribulation rapture teaching. The Progress of Dogma If the pretribulation rapture is taught in the New Testament, as this writer believes, why did it take 1,800 years for Christians to realize this doctrine? The answer lies in the fact that the tiiniilg of the rapture is more the product of one's theology than the prooftexting of specific passages. Thus the historical development of a certain theological climate led believers to give attention to this New Testament subject. The recovery of the pretribulational rapture as taught in the New Testament awaited the proper progress of dogma. In 1897, James Orr, a British postmillennialist, delivered a series of lectures at the Western Theological Seminary in Allegheny, Pennsylvania on the progress of dogma. Orr's thesis was that, generally speaking, the historical development of the church's understanding of her doctrine parallels the logical development of systematic theology. He said, "The articulation of the system in your text-books is the very articulation of the system in its development in history." Orr makes his case by noting the order in which virtually all theology textbooks logically develop their systems. Its opening sections are probably occupied with matters of Theological Prolegomena-with apologetics, the general idea of religion, revelation, the relation of faith to reason, Holy Scripture, and the like. Then follows the great divisions of the theological system-Theology proper, or the doctrine of God; Anthropology, or the doctrine of man, including sin (sometimes a separate division); Christology, or the doctrine of the flerson of Christ; Soteriology (Objective), or the doctrine of the work of Christ, especially the Atonement; Subjective Soteriology, or the doctrine of the application of redemption (justification, Regeneration, etc.); finally, eschatology, or the doctrine of the last things. If now, planting yourself at the close of the Apostolic Age, you cast your eye down the course of the succeeding centuries, you find, taking as an easy guide the great historical controversies of the Church, that what you have is simply the projection of this logical system on a vast temporal screen. Many scholars acknowledge that eschatology was the last major area of systematic theology formulated in detail by the church. Orr's view of doctrinal development gives the framework for understanding why a number of the details of prophecy were only understood later in church history. This is not to suggest that Orr's view is correct in every detail. But all can agree that eschatology has been a late development within the church's history. Dispensationalist Gerald Stanton wrote in 1956, During these past nineteen centuries, there has been a progressive refinement of the details of Christian theology, but not until the last one hundred years has Eschatology come to the front to receive the major attention and scrutiny of foremost Bible scholars. It is not that the doctrine of Christ's coming, or any of its special features, is new or novel, but that the doctrine has finally come into the place of prominence it rightfully deserves. With that rominence there has come a greater discernment of prophetic detail. It seems clear that prophecy-especially the futurist form of premillennialism-has only been developed in a detailed way since the Reformation and especially during the last 150 years. The following section presents some reasons why the doctrine of the pretribulational rapture has been a later development in the history of the church. Development of Eschatology The early church had a clear but undeveloped view of eschatology. They were premillennial, but had not formulated the system into anything that matches the sophistication of today's theologies. Nathaniel West, a Presbyterian pastor, said in the late 1800s concerning the predominance of chiliasm in the early church, "History has no consensus more unanimous for any doctrine than is the consensus of the Apostolic Fathers for the pre-millennial advent of Christ." Even though the early church was clearly premillennial, many of the details and implications of that doctrine had not been worked out. J. N. D. Kelly, a leading authority on early church doctrine, wrote along that line. Four chief moments dominate the eschatological expectation of early Christian theology-the return of Christ, known as the Parousia, the resurrection, the judgment, and the catastrophic ending of the present world-order. In the primitive period they were held together in a naive, unreflective fashion, with little or no attempt to work out their implications or solve the problems they raise. Harry Bultema echoed this perspective and underlined the undeveloped nature of the early church's premillennialism as something that "was not taught on the basis of any philosophical principle, but on the basis of oral tradition which had been received from the mouth of the apostles themselves." This likely explains why chiliasm, though undeveloped in detail, was so widely held. By the fifth century A.D., the amillennialism of Origen and Augustine had virtually eliminated all traces of premillennial teaching. This continued until shortly after the Reformation. In the early 1600s premillennialism began to return as a factor within the church after more than a "1,000-year reign" of amillennialism. This time premillennialism was not alone. A new approach known as postmillennialism grew up side by side with the premillennial revival. Many post-Reformation Puritans were divided between a mild form of premillennialism and the newly developingpostmillennialism popularized and systematized by Daniel Whitby in the early 1700s. However, the majority of post-Reformation Protestants continued to hold to the amillennialism of the Roman Church. Postmillennialism was popular for most of the 1700s until the French Revolution at the end of the century caused the optimism of Christendom to wane. Premillennialism then made its greatest surge as the 1800s began. However, premillenialism, like postmillennialism and amillennialism, was still dominated by the "historical" school of interpretation. By 1826, the more literal interpretation of the prophetic portions of Scripture known as "futurism" began to supplant the "historicism" of the previous 500 years. This environment of a literal, futurist, premillennial framework interacting with the progress made by systematic theology provided the momentum that led to the understanding of the pretribulational rapture. Pretribulational Ingredients in the Doctrine of the Pretribulational Rapture The doctrine of the pretribulational rapture is built on and derived from certain hermeneutical and theological factors. Walvoord is the leading present-day defender of this doctrine. The major headings that group his 50 arguments for the pretribulation rapture into categories, show that the early 1800s were the first time a climate existed conducive to the development of the doctrine. First, since the pretribulational rapture is a subdoctrine within premillennialism, and premillennialism alone, it requires a premillennial environment in which to thrive. Before the 1800s there were only two major eras of premillennialism: the early church (till about A.D. 400), and after the Reformation (the 17th century). Therefore almost two-thirds of the church's history has existed without a premillennial witness (1,200 years). It was impossible for a doctrine (the pretribulation rapture) to spring up in an environment lacking a necessary ingredient from which to build (premillennialism). So the fact that premillennialism began gaining popularity after the French Revolution is a major factor in its development. Second, when premillennialism returned to Christendom the dominant hermeneutical approach to key eschatological books, like Daniel and Revelation, was the historicism of the previous 600 years. As noted earlier, Maitland established the futurist hermeneutic for the first time since some of the church fathers. Futurism is the product of a more literalinterpretation of key eschatological themes. It sees, for example, the Antichrist as a future person, not as the pope of the Roman Church. The 1,260 and 2,300 days are seen as natural or literal days and therefore as yet future. The tribulation period is also to be taken as a future, literal time. Thus the literal hermeneutic of futurism was restored and further developed, which the pretribulational teaching requires in order to maintain certain distinctions such as that between Israel and the church. The return of premillennialism and the literal, futurist hermeneutic included widespread belief in the nearness of the return of the Lord (imminency); the hopeless apostasy of the church; the great tribulation in the near future; and the conversion of the Jews and their return to Israel as a nation. Brethren historian Harold Rowdon noted that "a distinction was drawn . . . between the 'epiphany' and the 'advent' or 'parousia' of Christ.," This along with a gap between the two comings formed for the first time a climate that resulted in the development of the doctrine of the rapture before the tribulation. Another reason the theological climate, combined with Bible study, is likely the major factor in the development of the pretriblilational rapture doctrine, is the fact that when it was taught, many others, influenced by the same climate, embraced the teaching. It is one thing to come up with an idea, but most ideas become accepted only when the public is ready. It seems that many others were already thinking along the same line as Darby, which accounts for the spread and acceptance by many of the teaching of the pretribulational rapture. Conclusion F. F. Bruce's conclusion as to where Darby got the doctrine of the pretribulational rapture seems to be correct. "It was in the air in the 1820s and 1830s among eager students of unfulfilled prophecy.... Direct dependence by Darby on Margaret Macdonald is unlikely." Dave MacPherson has failed to demonstrate that Macdonald's "prophecy" contains latent rapture ideas, nor has he linked Darby to her influence with clear, historical evidence. This is why the doctrine of the pretribulational rapture did not begin with Margaret Macdonald. Perhaps Darby's training at Dublin accounts for many of his views, especially his views on the nature of the church. Walvoord concludes, Any careful student of Darby soon discovers that he did not get his eschatological views from men, but rather from his doctrine of the church as the body of Christ, a concept no one claims was revealed supernaturally to Irving or Macdonald. Darby's views undoubtedly were gradually formed, but they were theologically and biblically based rather than derived from Irving's pre-Pentecostal group. *************** Prophe-Zine News Bite THE COMING WORLD GOVERNMENT By Jack Van Impe Welcome to the U.N.'s 'Global Neighborhood' The United Nations Commission on Global Governance has completed a three-year study of how to implement world government by the year 2000. The report comes in the form of a 410-page book titled "Our Global Neighborhood," publishedby Oxford University Press. "It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation-states, however powerful," writes Maurice Strong, former head of the U.N. Environment Program and secretary-general of the U.N. Conference on Environment and Development. "It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the imperatives of global environmental cooperation." Make no mistake -- Strong and the U.N. have their sights set on the wealth and freedom of the United States and other western powers. The idea is to create a giant, global welfare state in which wealth and power are taken from some by force and given to others. "Although people are born into widely unequal economic and social circumstances, great disparities in their conditions or life chances are an affront to the human sense of justice," the report explains. Environmental concerns will be the principal vehicle by which the U.N. consolidates its power. Under the plan, the U.N. Trusteeship Council would be restructured to give 23 individuals extraordinary international powers over what the report calls the "global commons." What are the global commons? "The atmosphere, outer space, the oceans and the related environment and life support systems that contribute to the support of human life," explains the report. In other words, virtually everything will be under U.N. stewardship. Is all this just some wild pipedream? Hardly. All existing international environmental treaties -- about 300 of them in total -- are already administered by the U.N. This new plan would simply place them under the authority of the Trusteeship Council and give the U.N. wider enforcement power. Already the U.N., claiming an interest in the area under the 1972 World Heritage Treaty, is pushing a plan to close off development of millions of acres in the American West. Under the U.N.'s treaty provisions, the United States government is now required to get approval for development near World Heritage Sites. The Clinton administration is taking this very seriously and complying with U.N. demands. In fact, in April, President Clinton announced a plan to designate 5 million acres in 17 national parks as wilderness areas, a move that would put those lands off limits even to tourists. Imagine national parks off-limits to tourists? Wasn't tourism the justification for the parks being nationalized in the first place? All this is part of the United Nations bigger plan -- "Agenda 21," a blueprint for global environmental dictatorship that calls for "re-wilding" at least half of the continental U.S. The premise of this agenda is that human society is a cancer on the planet and that radical surgery is required to bring it under control. Rep. Helen Chenoweth says the ideas being put forth by the U.N. are inspired by a religious worldview -- "a cloudy mixture of earth worship, pagan mysticism and folklore". That worldview was endorsed by Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt during an address late last year to the National Religious Partnership for the Environment. He condemned traditional Christianity and exalted pagan nature worship as the basis for a new social "covenant." "The U.N. is in the process of acquiring its own superlative status as the primary law-making entity for the world," explains Henry Lamb, founder and chairman of the Environmental Conservation Organization. That's the message of a new book by William Knoke, founder and president of the Harvard Capital Group, as well, who writes in "Bold New World": "In the 21st century, we will each retain our 'indigenous' cultures, our unique blend of tribal affiliations, some acquired by birth, others chosen freely. Many of us will live in one place for most of our lives and take pride in the local region. Yet our passion for the large nation-state, for which our ancestors fought with their blood, will dwindle to the same emotional consequences of county or province today. A new spirit of global citizenship will evolve in its place, and with it the ascendancy of global governnance." Knoke explains that this will happen as regional blocs -- such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and the European Union -- form over trade issues, desire for common currency and environmental regulations. "In each case, we are experimenting with new ways to link countries, to yield sovereignty in exchange for something more than what is lost," Knoke writes. "What happens in Europe will very much be the model for world consolidation in the 21st century, not just economically, but politically and socially as well." Knoke urges the U.N. to be equipped with taxing powers, a standing army, a world police force manned by "peacekeepers" who are "a combination of social worker, policeman, riot police and Rambo-style SWAT commandos." What's holding back this brave new world? It seems only a vacuum of leadership -- that one charismatic official capable of uniting people throughout a continent and throughout the world. The next few months may well produce some new leadership on the world stage. Within a nine-month period, Israelis, Russians, Americans and the United Nations all hold elections. It is entirely possible that one or more of these elections could be critical in the formation of the coming world government. In addition, in October, the State of the World Forum will reconvene in San Francisco to plan how more and more power can be placed in the hands of fewer and fewer people. As Chairman Mikhail Gorbachev explained at the $3.5 million 1995 conference: "From the outset, I would like to suggest that we consider the establishment of a kind of global brain trust to focus on the present and the future of our civilization." Co-chairman Thabo Mbeki, executive deputy president of South Africa, went even further: "There will be no day of days when a new world order will come into being. Step by step and here and there, it will arrive, and even as it comes into being, it will develop fresh perspectives, discover unsuspected problems and go on to new adventures. We make bold to say that some of those new adventures will consist in what we have sought to describe -- the formation of a new system of governnance marked by a dynamic interaction between an empowered citizenry, national government that will have impacted upon by the erosion and diffusion of its powers and the enhancement of global governnance. What it is that 'slouches toward Bethlehem tobe born' remains to be seen." Students of Bible prophecy know just what will be born of global government -- a tyrannical world leader responsible for bringing the world little but death and destruction.(Daniel 7:23, Revelation 13:7, 16-18, 7:12-13) This article first appeared in the Van impe Intelligence Briefing July 96 issue. Check out Dr. Van impe's www site at: http://www.niagara.com/~jvim/ +++++++++++++ Like it or Not, Cash is Becoming Obsolete....... By: Wayne Merritt a1nonly@iinet.com This was the name of an article I found in Compute, a San Diego Based Computer Rag. The article went on to talk about "e-cash", the next step in the global communications age. Let Me Quote some parts of the article for you: Quote 1 "The fourth kind of payment method, soon to hit the Internet, is electronic cash. This consists of an encrypted digit, or serial number, issued by the consumer's bank and STORED on the consumers cash card or hard drive". My Comment: Stored on a cash card (too easy to lose) or on a hard drive (only accessed at home or by a laptop). Next step after this works will be in a persons right hand or forehead. That would "seal" the cash card to prevent a stolen or lost card. If the storage is on you, you can't lose it. If you are handicapped, without a right hand, you need a head to live, so the forehead is the alternative. I personally feel that this will be spiritual too. In other words, when this day finally comes, those deciding to take this mark will know that they are giving everything to the beast, the political, financial and religous system of the day. Those who reject this, will know that its against God and they will be the ones I call the Tribulation Saints! I am also fully convinced that the Mark will be after the rapture (2Thes 2:6-10) When the restrainer is taken out of the way, then the wicked will be revealed. Sometimes I really don't think we realize how much restraining is going on today....but when the Holy SPirit and the Church is taken out of the way.... standby inhabitents of the earth! (I am glad Paul didnt write "Taken Away" but he wrote "Taken out of the way" Holy Spirit is still present, and will get involved again when the 144,000 from the 12 tribes go evangilizing like never before seen. You know those who say "dont push your religion on me".... well, they have something to really look forward too) Quote 2 "One of the benefits of e-cash is that it allows the person making the payment to remain anonymous, but the person receiving the payment reveals his identity when he "cashes" the e-cash at the bank that issued it." My Comment: The bank that issued it!!! Think about that. There are hundreds of banks, for now. Is this saying that one day banks will be united into one big one? Well, that will happen, I beleive, and if we keep tabs on that arena, we can easly see banks emerging today, left and right. In fact, not only the banking industry, but Entertainment is also merging. Thats real interesting, considering What Ted Turner and Time Warner are really all about. The effect Television has on this nation, and worldwide is astounding and more so than one can even imagine. The effect of Movies is just as effective, but not in quanity. ID4: The Movie, united the world against Aliens, Aliens commercials are out and the Roswell tapes are now going to be a series on Fox (or NBC, cant recall). The Outer Limits, Star Trek and Lost In Space are really nothing compared to the Roswell Tapes. See, Roswell suppose to be a real alien autopsy. Yesterday it was entertainment, today its real?!?! Tommorow it may be the excuse why millions suddenly vanished from the Earth! Watch for more and more movies, TV Shows on this spiritual, alien awakening.... But be carefull, subliminal messaging is becoming common ground for this new age in which we live. (Subliminal = subconscience messages sent to your brain though quick pictures spliced into certain TV Commercials, Shows and possibly Movies) Quote 3 "Netscapes new LIVEPAYMENT software will open the door for secure business transactions over the Internet" My Comment: Livepayment even sounds scary. Probably because today even dead people are paying taxes. Anyway, we have to watch for the words used to lull people into an easier way to do things. I firmly beleive that word games kill and destroy peoples lives. The words that move the Abortion movement and Euthenasia are deceiving, like Pro Choice and Right To Die! The words used for homosexuality agendas, like tolerence and affirmative action and my favorite "Equal Opportunity Employer"...... If I had a company and put an ad in the paper it would end with "Homo's need not apply". All joking aside, words kill and our ideas have consequences. I have become more aware of wording from the elite media, and elite politicians and the newspapers and so forth. As a Brother in Christ, I say watch the words you use or hear and like a filter, strain out the real agenda, and replace it with the correct meaning. Pray in this area, for wisdom and discernment so when the physco bable, Politically COrrect words come in your life, you can smile and say ThankYou Lord for your WORD......It can go in, but let it go out the bottom instead of from the tounge. I went off in 20 directions from those quotes, but to sum it up, I find it interesting that these quick, easy, safe ways are leading to the ultimate wrath of God. Remember those ad's : Slices, Dices, Cuts, with the super knife from Ginshe??? I used to laugh at those ads, but on the other hand thought wow, that would be nice to have. So I sent away for it, only to find that it was a good blade, with a cheap plastic handle, that would break within 6 months. Such are the ways of the world. Jesus comes with the ultimate sword, a handle that wont let you go, and our daily bread, along with living water, which, if we taste, we will never send away (or fall for) that plastic handle ginshee knife. Without Knowledge, my people perish. In His Name Wayne Merritt a1nonly@iinet.com Hebrews 4:12 +++++++++++++++ Bio-Chip Update Pet Microchips in CA Submitted by: "Justin"